Book Review : The Uprooted by S. L. Bhryappa

I wrote this on Sept 24, 2003 – I don’t know why I had not imported this review onto my blog THIS long. In any case here it is all over again.

Indian authors have never enjoyed world fame – Not many have been lucky in getting their work across the globe and show to people what fine writers India possesses. While most good authors have been vernacular authors in India, their works are rarely translated in put forward on the globe – While Bhyrappa was not as lucky as Marquez to get his work One Hundred Years Of Solitude to world and eventually win a Nobel prize for that, Bhyrappa’s most works evoke similar respect – For example, there is no better deserving book than Parva to sweep any kind of awards that exist in literary world, however, the lack of outreach has prevented this. For a long time I was in complete awe of Parva and though One Hundred years of Solitude did bring me out of that hang over, it required another of the same author’s work Vamshavriksha , translated The Uprooted (not quite literal translation, but very appropriate to the content), to bring me out of the magic of Parva . Incredibly simple and incredibly complex at the same time, this is a book that leaves its readers so drained, so full, so many answers, and so many questions, that in the end, a reader is bound by the duality of nature of the book.

’’Who are you? What are you? Where are you going? Ask these questions to yourself and watch these answers change…’’
— Richard Bach, Illusions

While Richard Bach merely chose to pose the questions and leave it to the reader, Bhyrappa asks the very same questions and more in the book.

Though, its not the questions that enthrall the reader, it’s the justification to the answers that enthrall you.

What is your purpose in life? Can faith be guided by greed? Do you love a person so much that you did give up your own child to be with him? Do you love your work so much that you did give up on your wife and family to pursue your goals? Are you strong enough to shed any kind of hatred towards another person? How much do you know about your child, and more importantly, yourself? Does your past make a difference to who you are? Does your past influence your future? Is devotion love? Is love devotion? Whose sorrow is great – a mother who lost her child or a child who lost her mother? Do you think you are firmly rooted in this circle of life?

Probably that is half the thinking a reader will do in reading this book. This is a book about two families whose lives intertwine with each other, and the complexities of each character touch upon almost everything in life. This is a story about a mother who lost her son to floods and feels the sorrow of it. It’s a story about a woman who lost her husband and her sorrow at becoming a widow so early in life. It’s a story of progressive thinking, that of a widow wishing to be happier in life. It’s a story of commitment to one’s dharma and karma by a person. Its also a story of man who is so passionate about his work that he forgets about his wife and his family for his work. It’s a story about a man who marries another lady out of pure love and greed of common goal. It’s a story of woman’s undivided love for her husband and the loneliness around her because her husband married someone else. It’s a story about a child loving man who is impotent, and his introspection of the various aspects of life that he has changed his opinion on. And its a story of a woman, a widow who mourns her husband, loves another man so much she wants to marry him. Yet she is also in the duality of her love to a man and duty of a widow, her unquestioning quest for the path that leads to mental peace.

Bhyrappa weaves his story around such principles and is able to bring about a justification which you cannot just help nodding with – Every character justifies his or her actions throughout their life, to the point, that their duality becomes an issue you think off, and not the characters. You cannot help sympathizing with the wife who longs for her husband, but you cannot help agreeing to the justification of the husband in leaving his wife for another woman. Such is the beauty of book – along with every character and their metamorphosis, you think the same way they do – to the point you ask the same questions to yourself. It’s a book that doesn’t play by characters, but becomes a study of human nature and its desires, the norms of the society, the regulations of the society imposed on life. At the very core lies in a story about two families, orthodox Hindu Brahmin families, trying to make sense of their duties as Brahmin, and at the same time find themselves uprooted of the very foundation of their life. Or like the author best describes in a passage – like a branch which fell from the tree as if the tree had no longer the use of that branch.

Another facet that caught my attention was the concept of using Nature and Man as metaphors through out the book. Prakirthi and Purusha, (Nature and Man) give this book an absolute Meta physical look to the book – while every event in the book derives a relation between nature and man in form of woman and man, it also derives beautifully the meaning of being uprooted of the nature (woman) and Purusha (man). To really grasp the meaning of this metaphysical line, its best left to the reader to understand it. And frankly I wont be able to explain it here.

Fortunately, the translation is again by my related grand-father Dr. K. Raghavendra Rao, and he doesn’t fail to deliver. This is a joint effort by him and his wife (who by the way is a very nice lady, and I shall always miss her tea that she used to prepare when I got home from college – can’t believe that was 9 years ago now!), and the effort shows. A translated version never really tells you the magic of author’s real wordings, but a great translation will captivate you in any language by the way it has been translated – same is with this book – the translation itself captivates you so much that you did desire to read the original too.

If Parva is possibly the best book I have read in my life, then The Uprooted comes a close second. Not a book to be missed at any cost in life.

The World This Week

So while the Desi Blogosphere went mad over Indian government’s ban on blogger, and then afterwards its post analysis of freedom expression, censorship and all, this is what has been happening in other parts of the world this past week.

Israel steps up its offensive against Lebanon – more and more civilians killed: I initially thought Israel’s step was a right one, but the more I think about it, I think its just another excuse for Israel to start a war and kill innocent people in the name of defending themselves. Israel’s war on a Middle East country works well with Bush as this fits perfectly with his grand scheme of Middle East domination, no wonder then as he says “Israel has right to defend herself” (he perhaps missed saying – so does India). What next US puppy… oops Israel? Syria? Jordan? Egypt?

But that doesnt stop Bush from protecting his other Puppy: Mush. Hence, he allows his crow Richard Boucher to hint that India is kidding about Pakistani hand in Mumbai Blasts

I know there’s a lot of speculation out there now. That happens in these cases. But I think we need to be led by the evidence before we start trying to draw conclusions and make policy pronouncements on it,"US assistant secretary of state Richard Boucher said on Monday.

And exactly what evidence was given when your own president invaded Iraq, Mr. Boucher?

So – On one had Bush thinks Israel’s war with Lebanon is justified, he chides India at the same time for suspecting Pakistan in Mumbai Blasts – Tch! We are so naive. Pakistan is holier than thou – what would we know?

I am sad that Pakistan doesnt have OIL. Then things would be different.

In other stories, there was a massive earthquake and a Tsunami in Indoneasia  of magnitude 7.7, resulting in a Tsumani of 6 feet, killing more than 600 people (officially). As if this were not enough, birds are causing havoc there, giving this country a dubious distinction of reporting the highest Bird Flu related deaths : 42.

But their inward problems doesnt seem to stop them from sending troops to Middle East

“In the current emergency situation, there has been readiness from Indonesia (to send troops). We expect the resolution to be issued in less than three months” said Percaya.

Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono has sent a letter to U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan, requesting the Security Council to result a resolution that allows the launch of peacekeeping operation in the Middle East.

Mr. President, there are more problems in your own country than you can handle – how about solving solving them first before heading into the Israel-Lebanon mess?

Which brings me back again to Israel – Lebanon mess and the civilians.

While we jump the gun to ridicule our Government and our Airlines, how about a simple gesture of thanks to Air India and Operation Sukoon  to save 12000 Indian nationals in Beirut.  Nah, Government against Blogspot is more important news. In the same vein, who will save the 80000  Sri  Lankans stranded in  Lebanon?  A "Special flight, courtesy Air Lanka?" – its a pity, most of these people including Sri Lankans and Indians are there either on labor work or maids and cooks. With a war raging on, I am sure they have been left by their employers to the sea.

Where do they go? What do they do? Those 12000 and 80000 people left their country to struggle and provide for their family back home. It is heartening to see India offering their helping hand to Sri Lanka and Nepalese for evacuation.

So MUCH happened in the world this week, yet, we are only concerned about Government’s nefarious plans against Bloggers, and inane discussions on censorship, should government ban sites or not and such.

Of Bus Rides Part 1

Thanks to Jedi and Karan, I am very inspired to pen my own memories of taking those bus rides back in life – this post is about those memories of India, while my next will be those of here.

As we trotted along the rickety 2 lane highway connecting Hubli and Dharwad, a couple of things always used to catch my interest. The temple at the edge of a lake, the Maruti showroom (believed to be one of the biggest at that time), the Cancer Research Hospital, and lastly, the most interesting, the Dental College, where it was well known that all the beautiful girls in the town studied there.

The last one being more important as I would always fantasize a scene where I would sit at the window, and the bus reached the dental hospital, where a beautiful girl step stepping inside the bus, would discover the only empty seat besides me, carefully adjusting her dupatta (if wearing salwar kameez), and sit down besides me, maintaining that one centimeter distance between me and her. She would give me a faint smile as she sat down, and I returned it with a big one, and then through rest of the journey, she would look back, asides, looking through the window of passenger seating on the other side of the bus, but never again in my direction. As my stop approached, I would excuse myself and get up to move out. It would be tricky – she wouldn’t get up to lose her seat, and there was just not too much space for me to move out. So she would turn sideways, still sitting, and as I gradually made my way out, she would slide in quickly to that window seat that I had occupied. I would smile again for the favor, and she would give that faint smile again, this time a little more comfortable. As I would get down from the bus, I would see now that she was looking out of the window, at no one in particular, to nothing in general. As the bus would pass by, she and I would suddenly lock eyes, perhaps one last time, or perhaps may be not, and smile again. The beginnings of a great romance I would pat myself, and move on.

Read more

One

July 5, 2005: Attack on Ayodhya, 1 Civilian dead, 2 security personnel seriously injured.

March 7, 2006: Varanasi Bombings, 20 dead, hundreds injured.

October 29, 2005: Delhi Bombings, Atleast 61 dead, hundreds injured.

July 28, 2005: Jaunpur Train Bombing, 13 dead, more than 50 injured.

May 3, 2006: J&K Massacre, 35 dead.

June 26, 2006: Vaishnodevi bombings, 1 dead, 35+ injured.

July 11, 2006: 5 Blasts rock Srinagar, 6 dead, Many injured.

July 11, 2006: 7 Blasts in Mumbai Trains, 174 dead, Hundreds Injured.

Our response:

“Blasts were cowardly act aimed at innocent people”

“We condemn such blasts”

“Terrorists want to disrupt harmony”

“This will not affect Indo-Pak peace dialogue”

“Those responsible will not be spared and brought to justice”

Talk, talk, and more talk…

June 25, 2007: ONE Israeli soldier is abducted by their enemines.

The response: A full fledged war to rescue him.

Shame on you, Manmohan Singh.

One Man Ruined It All.

One Game Unites All.

You won’t remember the cool and composed penalty kick in the 9th minute.

You won’t remember the counter attack in 19th.

You won’t even remember Italy, the Winners of World Cup 2006.

What you will remember though, is this:

Zinedine Zidane

One Man Ruined It All.

Zinedine Zidane.

Image Taken From www.fifaworldcup.com

You and Me

Disclaimer: I think there has been a fair amount of confusion about this writing, because I wrote it in first person with me as a character. To make it clear, this post is a short story, and a work of fiction predominantly. I say predominantly because certain settings and background have come out of real life, but the story in itself is complete fiction :). Enjoy the story!

1997

I met you at at that party. You were wearing jeans and a t-shirt, something uncommon considering that I had always seen you in salwar-kameez in college. May be you did not want to create the wrong impression I figured; it was 1997, after all. I was meeting all of you for the first time probably. I knew the guys from college, they were all my classmates; it was their group party – to which I was invited too, perhaps as an initiation into the group. I met many people that party, yet your memory haunted me well after the party. After all you had said – “Aquarians are romantic!” No one had told me this before, and I at such blossoming prospect couldn’t help but smile.

1998

We’d known each other for 6 months already, and if not anything, we were slowly becoming the best of friends. You wouldn’t look at me in college lest your friends made fun of you. I wrote down your name and birthday in my diary, in an encrypted form, lest any of my mates figured out who it was. Often we would run into each other in college, almost not expectedly, but since we had, we would stop and say “Hi” to each other. At times when you were alone, you would talk; Maybe for two, or three minutes; usually about classes and such. We both knew we would have lots to talk about when we met in parties – our private parties – where there were just the few of us close friends – and nobody looked up on us. The arrangement worked for you, but was still weird for me; though it didn’t matter when we met up like that.

We’d talk about everything under the sun. There was always something to talk about with you; sometimes they were the same things over and over again, sometimes things which both knew about already, or sometimes things that didn’t make any sense – we never went out of topics. And then when I’d come back to my dorm, I’d make a note of it in my diary. Every single time we met, every single time you said “Hi”, went in my diary. In no time, I had lots of cryptic numbers (of your name) scribbled everywhere in my diary. We’d still maintain our stoic distance in college, but when we were away outside of college, far from conspiring eyes, we jelled, we had fun, we fought, and we did everything that all couples in love do.

Except that we were still the best of friends.

One day in a party we’d organized out of city in a park full of trees and lush meadows, you let me into your life. You told me about your previous love, a love that you and he both lost. And that it has been the biggest regret of your life and, you confidently asserted that it was his biggest mistake too. You also told me the reason why you didn’t speak to me in college. There was another guy in college in love with you, who wouldn’t take it nicely if he ever saw me or any other guy talking to her. “Do you like him” I had asked, barely whispering, expecting a negative, to which you replied “I don’t know”.

You told me you liked being with me because we didn’t go there, where others went. We didn’t talk about love, we didn’t talk about being together, and we never questioned ourselves if we had any feelings for each other. You liked it, because it set you free of thought – it made you happy being able to talk to me without the burden of questioning yourself about me. It was a poignant moment, both for me and you, for entirely different reasons, yet, we both held our peace.

You wouldn’t tell me much about your previous love, not even his name that day. I figured it out few days ahead, unfortunately to discover, it was a close friend of mine, in the group. It was useless to ask both of you why they never talked about it with me, much with you; maybe you both did not want to talk about it. Maybe you both didn’t feel the need. And yet, the day you told me about him, it was obvious: You both had never really broken up. Both of you wanted to be together again, though both of you were held back waiting for the other to make a move.

1999

We still remained the best of friends.

I had stopped writing the diary by then. It was no use – it didn’t matter. All it contained were a bunch of cryptic numbers in meaningless sentences. Maybe I stopped writing after that party, I don’t know.

We went again to the same place for a party again. It was almost a year we’d been to this place – the grass had grown taller, no one obviously had bothered to cut them out. You didn’t seem in a mood to talk that day, and I let it be. Something was bothering you, but you wouldn’t talk. I wouldn’t force you to either. But everyone else too noticed that you weren’t the same. And then he tried to talk to you about it – he had come along to the party. He was in every party.

He tried to talk to you, alone. May be this is their day to be together, I wondered. Maybe they would realize that they couldn’t live without each other, I thought with a tinge of disappointment. But he came back, angry, and miffed. You’d retorted back that it was too late, and there was no need of him being in your life anymore. You’d said that everything was not as easy it was anymore, and you did not have to go through it. He of course, did not understand most of it, but what he did, was enough to put that last crack in the glass to cut it in two.

It was my turn. You were sitting a hundred yards away, looking elsewhere. You sat there, with tears in your eyes, with a look so despondent. We didn’t talk for a while; perhaps for a long time. And then you told me. The other guy in college had proposed to her, again, and this time he needed an answer. You were confused, you didn’t know if you loved him, and I was sure you didn’t. You said you’d been feeling disgusted, low and how entire world wanted to know what she thought about him. Why couldn’t she be friends with that guy, you asked me, just as you and I were? To which I had no answer, but a smile. A concealed smile.

By the time you were done telling me about the other guy, hitherto, all unknown facts to me, it was too late in the evening. Clouds had gathered and the signs seemed ominous. Everyone had already left for home, waiting for us, except him, and another friend.

He asked you to sit behind him on his bike; you refused. Instead, you wanted to sit behind me on my bike. As we started for the long drive home, it started drizzling. Even on the bike, you tried to maintain a distance between you and me; as the rain picked up strength, you put your hand on my shoulder, perhaps for support. As the rain grew stronger, did your grip on my shoulder; leaving me wondering why. Ultimately we decided we had to stop, as it was impossible to drive in that rain. I didn’t know where my friends were either – perhaps they had zoomed off. By the time we had found a bridge to stop under, both of us were soaked, to the skin.

We stood there, waiting, shivering, waiting for the rain to pass by; instead it only became stronger, now bringing with it thunder and lightning. You stood at the edge where you were being hit by rain slightly, but you wanted to look at that house on top of the hill. It looked beautiful in such rain, you exclaimed. It did look breathtaking. You said something then, that like the first time we met, I will never forget – “I’ll cherish this moment for forever. You, me, this rain, that house. This is all I want to remember of today.” I’d said that the bike ride was I’d remember most.

2000

We were just friends.

Somehow after that party, things changed for you, me, him and the other guy. Maybe it was all too complicated. Right after the party, a few weeks later, you’d asked me to assure her that nothing of “that” sort would ever happen between me and you, like it did between you and them both. We were meant to be the best of friends, and I was the only friend you could talk to. By that time, however, little did you notice, I had stopped talking, talking about all the things that I’d felt talking about. Maybe you were too busy to care. Maybe you were right – you could talk your heart out to a friend without a bother, but not someone you care about. Perhaps I was that friend. Maybe I was the difference that you were looking for. I wondered how long would we both handle it?

It was graduation. You refused to write in my scrap book that I had prepared with much hard work. You had gone into your own shell by then; you did not seem to want to talk much either. Not just me, but just about anyone. He had lost interest too, or perhaps he had moved on. After that party, you and he still remained friends, but as they say, you can join the glass pieces again, but the crack’s always visible. It remained that way I guess between you and him.

I could see that guy too had withered. Maybe he’d realized he was not the one for you. He’d tried his best – he talked to you twice, once met me and asked me to talk to you (and I refused), and once threatened to beat me up if I didn’t make things happen between you and him. Yet, nothing much happened. One day, I tried bringing on the subject – tried to understand if you had made up your mind, to which your reply still was the same: “I don’t know”.

A few days before I left, I called you, asked you to give me a photograph of yours. It was funny, in spite of knowing you for so many years we didn’t share one photograph together. And I deserved it as a parting memory. You refused. You reasoned, he too had asked for a photograph once, and after you gave it to him, things went downhill. You didn’t want that to happen. You were acting stupid, I knew, but you had tested my patience finally.

You knew it by the time call ended that we’d just broken another glass.

2002

After two years of non communication since that day, you sent me an email with the subject: I’m getting married.

I thought for a while before opening the email. I hoped you had finally made up your mind.

It was neither of them.

You and I chatted and emailed each other. You had married, and it didn’t matter now, I figured. Perhaps, I could still be the friend you wanted. You told about your marriage, your move to America, your sedate lifestyle. I told you about my move to US as well, and things were so different in the country. I missed my life back home from our days, I’d tell you, to which you’d always you were glad to be out of it.

2004

And then just like that you asked me once on chat why I didn’t call her up. I picked up the phone that moment and called you. Your voice, still that same, but changed – you had suitably subdued, so had I, perhaps.

We still didn’t run out of topics to say to talk to one another. Or at least we tried to talk about different things. But you and I both came back to those days, of missed life and opportunities lost. We tried changing the subject several times, but we found our way back to him, that guy and that life. I tried to talk you out of it; instead, you talked me into it. I was still the only friend she could talk, you said, and I gave in.

We talked and talked, but you didn’t notice we’d spent more than three hours of talking – I changed my phone from my cell to landline after my battery gave up, but then, there was so much to talk about. And yet, it all felt pointless. Why were we talking about a life gone by? I had so much talk to, but nothing what I would want to say had any meaning anymore.

You told me about the other guy. How he tried to get me to talk to you, and she warned him that it was none of my business. You told me how he doubted that she had fallen for me. And how it had incensed him to the point of causing harm to himself. And others. You told me after she came to know of his tryst with me, you’d warned him that if he ever did anything to me, she would never speak to him again, and his hopes could rest. You had given up on everything around her you said, and even I wasn’t around that time. Little wonder then that she did not feel compelled to share that photograph. I did not speak much – there was no point in what we were speaking.

Maybe I was just that friend whom you could talk to. Nothing more.

2006

We never talked again on the phone like that..I had to move on, so did you. Maybe that last call was all that was left of us to tell each other. Maybe I needed that one last affirmation perhaps too. Chatting and mailing each other became irregular to non-communicative. Months moved, and we fell out of touch. Perhaps there was no need anymore.

Maybe I should not have called. I gathered that you had moved places, perhaps to a different country. There was no point anymore, now that I didn’t have your number anymore.

Yesterday, after nearly a year of non communication, I heard from you. You left me an offline message on my messenger:

“Call me”

The world cup post

I am not an avid follower of football, as in I don’t or never follow club championships and the likes. Hence Arsenal is as powerful as Manchester United to me, and perhaps Real Madrid is better than both of them (all of which can be wrong). But there’s something about world cup football though that makes me glued to the TV from the start to the finish – something about its enormous scope, the countries involved, the sheer number of fans involved – all of this are enough to attract me. I love football as a sport, most definitely, and believe it’s the best game man invented as well, but ahem, to watch on TV. – At least for me!

Anyways, going back in time some few moons ago (well make that many moons), I faintly recall that the first time I actually played football was in seventh grade. SEVENTH?! You may ask – “What did I do till then?” – To which my answer would be a shameless – “Nothing”. I had better things to do than play football, cricket, or umm, just play. I had important things to figure out: Will Chamataka succeed in his nefarious plans? Or will Doobdoob fail him again? Football could wait – there were more pressing matters at hand. Raaka had just run away with Chacha Chaudary’s wife – will Sabu and Chacha rescue them?!

Ok I made the last one up – but I wouldn’t have been surprised if it had been like that. Anyhow, I was introduced to the lovely game of football in Pune. In Pune, I had a huge circle of friends living in the same colony; some older than us, some younger than us, but always hanging out together. Every evening we used to meet up on our building terrace, where the game in fashion would be commenced – usually it would be cricket (yeah, on terrace), or hand tennis, or yes, football.

I think it was the 1990 world cup season when as the game of fashion went, we decided to play football. The funny thing about it was, though I was the only guy who did not know what football was or how it was played, I was the only one in the building who had a real football with me – the ones that they actually used in matches. (Why the studious Suyog had a football in the first place is a different story).

Anyhow as we settled on the terrace and teams were formed, came the crucial time to select the roles of respective players. It didn’t matter – anyone could be forward, midfield or defender – as once the game started, everyone was bound to bump into one another looking for the ball. Nonetheless it was important to define roles. (Some of our friends, older than us, had “deeper” knowledge of football than we weasels. Hence, the object of role defining was for the older guys to get challenging roles, while weaklings and younger were relegated to smaller roles).

Roles also helped us blame one another in case there was a goal from opposing side. We could argue that defender should have been defending the ball rather trying to flick the ball and take to opposite side. It worked the other way too – defender could safely blame forward. The forward was lousy defender and actually blocked the defender from defending – no wonder goals were scored.

Defining roles had yet another advantage though. Nobody wanted to be the goalie. And I didn’t know what forward, center of defender meant – which meant I got to don the role of the goalie. A goalies job is the most important one in football, so I was told, and it would be a challenge to accept the role of a goalie I was made to believe. Not being the athletic type, a goalie’s job was just what I wanted. After all how many times will a guy from other side try to score anyways?

But my hopes were short lived – remember we were playing on terrace? Hence there was only so much space for your football field – which was a good 60×60 feet in all. That meant the role of the goalie was extremely challenging at both ends. You see, at any given time of the match anyone could be aiming for any goal in any direction. The ball was always in vicinity; which also explains why once the game started everyone would bump into each other jumping on the same ball – there was just not enough space! You could walk 10 feet away from the game and wait your whole life but the ball wouldn’t come to you.

And goals were scored in plenty too. I don’t remember any single digit scorecard from those days. It was difficult to figure out who was a lousier goalie amongst the two appointed (the second of whom agreed to be goalie after much haggling about how he would be forward in the next match if he held the score of the opposing team below 10, which unfortunately never happened, hence he was relegated to that role forever. I on the other hand, did not pursue such ambitions, so no one cared).

Nonetheless I received my dose of flak too – usually the team that had me the goalie had a greater chance of losing the match. My team would have wished that I never played with them, but for a crucial detail:

Only I had the “super” football (as they called), and certainly, there was no football if there was no Suyog.

Hence various ideas were proposed. Initially it was agreed that we two goalies would switch places each match. Which resulted in opposing team always winning – it worked out well except that when we started playing “advanced” series, i.e. best of three matches (Yeah, how? Well after our endless double digit (21-18, 30-25, you get the picture) matches, we decided that any team that scored 11 goals first would win. No, that still didn’t help the other goalie from getting into forward. May be he did improve, or had just given up any hopes. Or may be he was as lousy as me…)

Anyhow the problem was apparent: any team that fielded me as a goalie in the first match had an undue disadvantage of fielding me twice – the first and the third match – which also meant the other team, won 2-1. That was not acceptable they figured, after several hard fought matches went the other way, and there was no “real” competition in matches, as the eventual outcome depended on which side I was on.

So they did the next best thing – they “Subbed” me. Which opened another can of worms about who would sub me? After much haggling and discussions, it was decided that the guy who scored least number of goals (poor defender, poor younger people) would be goalies on a turn by turn basis. Initially I used to be subbed fairly late in the game, but as time went by I began to be subbed almost after the first goal.

That improved their performance by heaps – suddenly matches became competitive, and playing time extended by 10 minutes (yeah, remember the other goalie was lousy too? – he was next in line after me to be subbed). Nonetheless, my role further was relegated to getting the football from the road if my team mate hit the football from the terrace and it landed on the ground. That was the pits.

And then one day – something unfortunate happened. For all that “super” football image that my football had gathered, it burst. Yes it burst. Resulting in comments that my football was just as good as any other, and it was certainly not the “matches” variety – after all matches football didn’t burst, would they?. How? Why? When? Who? None of it really matters, nor do I remember it now, but I remember getting angry at everyone and everybody around about it, and how their reckless behavior had made the football go phuus, and more importantly, how not having me in the team resulted into all this. This was my chance at getting at them. The once glorious football laid now, a deflated piece.

Secretly I was also thankful that it ended the unending misery of me having to get the football from the road all the time. Around that time Tennis season started, and well, all of us got into the tennis mode. That was that, for another year of football.

Following year we played football, but my importance had substantially decreased, now that I didn’t have the “super” football. Not that I made any specific attempts to improve my skill set to merit a selection either. Funnily enough though, the next year out of pity of having been a goalie for the entire last year, I was allowed to be a defender.

Which pretty much meant I did nothing and usually spent time chatting with the goalie and wait for things to happen. There was no way I was going rush into the melee, and I figured if there was any way I could touch a football “during play” (yes, emphasis on those words), it would have to be in that position.

Sadly, even that didn’t happen that year. With the end of that year, my glorious affair with football ended too.

After those two years, I took on a more prominent role for myself in the grand scheme of things in football.

I became that – cheering, shouting hoarse, and booing the opposite team – fan, of my team.

I still am.

Herge, The Genius

I have always considered Herge as a genius cartoonist, and his Tintin remains one of my all time comics. I still read it. Here is an example why.

The picture below is from a scene in “The Calculus Affair” – A scandal has broken out at Marlinspike Hall, and everybody in town wants to know about it. Herge illustrates the scene. The details are just AMAZING!

Read more

Football Wootball Hai Rabba!

I waited yesterday the whole afternoon for the answer. I spent the entire last night biting my nails in anticipation – What if? However? But then? Maybe somehow? Questions with all their possible answers kept me on tenterhooks. After all world up was at stake – and its of paramount importance that I have every bit of information at hand at my disposal. I had to, had to know:

Why does Raima Sen like David Beckham?

Says Raima:

“Some of them are so cute! I just can’t take my eyes off them. Whenever there is an England match, I make it a point to see at least the highlights.

How can I miss the chance of seeing (David) Beckham? I don’t have any qualms in admitting that I like Beckham more for his looks than his game. His smile is sure to melt a box of bonbons. And I love Ronaldinho’s hair style!”

Oh my! She also knows Ronaldinho and umm likes his hairstyle. Isn’t he the guy known more for his unending smile, energy, pace and style on the field? Such bunkum details couldn’t bother Raima could it? After all, Raima you must be busy noticing his curls, and must have spent a better part of your day calling up your sister and confirming if Ronaldinho was indeed a guy, in which case his hairstyle rocked, and otherwise, you would have said – “Curls are for Preity. They are so 2002”.

Nonetheless, your gracious self also said:

“Which team should win the World Cup? “Brazil, of course! It would be quite an experience to see (my favourite) Ronaldinho’s team lifting the cup.”

Raima, here is a quick test to check if someone really knows about football or not:

Ask them which cup will win the world cup. If they say “Brazil”, they don’t know anything.

Ah, neat trick isn’t it? If there is no one to bank on, of course Brazil must win the cup – after all Ronaldinho has melted Raima’s heart to bonbons.